Major Newspapers, |
Wednesday, June 11. 2008Who do the Dems Think They're Kidding?Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Without looking at the actual comments made -- I know my party pretty well, I can guess -- I'm going to go ahead and say that being an embarrassment (to thought and thinking, and otherwise) is hardly a one-party activity.
I'm just saying it's important to keep things in perspective. A former Republican Majority Leader once said our country would be better off if a segregationalist had won the Presidency-- I'm guessing Harry Reid didn't top that while capitalizing on McCain's slip.
Perspective? Gimme a break!
As a matter of fact, Sen. Reid was over-the-top today in a television appearance -- he's so pathetic! And yes, former Repub Majority Leader Trent Lott said something stupid about a former segregationist -- and he was forced out of his position for a time after a huge hullabaloo. Yet Sen. Robert Byrd, a former recruiter for the KKK, was the Dems' Senate leader for 12 years (1977-1989) -- with nary a peep from the media! You really don't want to get into a conversation about 'perspective' when the modern Democratic Party has become so beholden to the Hyperbolic Imperative, do you?
I wouldn't mind it, because I'm standing by my position that both parties have some deeply seeded problems, and I'd be interested to see how a "Hyperbolic Imperative" holds up against flights of Republican fancy such as:
-Funding for abstinence 'education' that has been proven ineffective -Going into debt for the sake of tax cuts -Evolution. I'm guessing you wouldn't believe the Gallup poll that found 68% of Republicans said they didn't believe in it, but during the primaries at least 3 of the candidates raised their hands to say they didn't believe in evolution (McCain, to his credit, wasn't one of them). To name a few. So I'm not really scared of a conversation about 'perspective' when I think both sides could use a lot more of it.
This is what you've come up with?
Quite frankly, I'm not sure which is worse, people who don't believe in Theory of Evolution, or those who think the Bush tax cuts have caused our national debt (I'm not directing this specifically at you)... And don't even try and put the funding for abstinence education at the top of any list for goodness sakes. You wanna talk disgusting political posturing? Why do the Dems oppose real education reform in a country where 26 of the largest 50 school districts graduate less than 60% of their kids? How can the Dems continue with their focus-group directed rhetoric about Social Security when the average SS recipient lives on about $1,100 per month (it's because it polls well, not because they're protecting the middle class)? And that's just the tip of the iceberg... The Repubs are far from perfect, but the Dems ran this country for 68 years, and some of the worst of their ideas from the end of that reign are now being feted as 'new' ideas from a Chicago pol who has convinced a coalition of the young, our educational establishment, government workers, and his ethnic group of black voters that he is a 'change candidate.'
Now you're just grasping. If someone disagrees with you about what good education reform is, and happens to oppose your brand, they are not "oppos[ing] real education reform".
Neither is it "focus-group directed rhetoric" if someone views the problems of social security differently than you do. As for the rest-- what can I say? Stranger things have happened, and nobody listened to me ranting and raging 8 years ago when the son of a former president claimed he wasn't a Washington insider. Don't forget that the Republicans ran pretty much all branches of the government for a good portion of 8 years, and didn't fete very many new ideas of their own.
What nonsense. What utter nonsense...
What educational reform have the Dems offered? Other than more money (ignoring the fact that real spending on education has more than tripled in the last four decades), nothing. Zip. Nadda. Zilch. Other than protecting their interest group, the teacher's unions, that is. As for SS reform, the Dems are an absolute and total disgrace -- other than to demagogue the issue, what have they offered besides another tax increase (15 of them so far since the program started)? The average SS recipient gets $1,100 per month in benefits; 20%-25% of all recipients receive SS as their sole source of income; and another 40%-45% have it account for at least half of their income. This is a national disgrace... because we know how to do it better (like, say, a program like government workers have .. ya know, containing those risky things like stocks and bonds; I know: The Horror!) |
SearchSupporterAlamsed reviewed
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> |