There're several factors we all have to remember... that Sen. Obama runs on 'change',so an Obama-Clinton will disillusion the Obama supporters in their hope for change. We have to consider several other important and revelant factors. Sen Obama and Sen. Clinton are totally different and unmatchable in personality and traits, in organizing and management style and skills, and in problem solving. Besides, we've seen that Sen. Clinton is a very demanding negotiator and never the sort to accept 'no' for an answer, once her mind is set to do as she pleases and even if she can be proven wrong. They are like two very opposing poles of Earth. An Obama-Clinton ticket can be expected to be a bad marriage. Yes, an Obama-Clinton may be the answer to winning the election for the Democratic Party, but it is going to hurt the Democratic Party in the four years with the expectation of bickerings and fights between the two over decision making. The four years of a Democrat White House, seen as a disaster, will damage the credibilty of the Democratic Party for future elections, and hence, not the type of risk the Party should take. Let us not forget that there's no saying that Bill Clinton isn't going to an intruder and jeopardize the 'marriage' in the four years.

I have more faith in the Democratic Party in finding the right person for the VP post than to believe that Sen. Clinton, and only Sen. Clinton, is the only and absolute answer for the Party. After all, watching the same Bush people that are surrounding and advising Sen. McCain, and no matter how Sen. McCain flip-flops to deceive voters, Americans can expect four more years of the same growing pains of the Bush Era, and of course wars and more wars and more graves to dig for our soldiers to be burried, rising National Debt, and runaway inflation... if Sen. McCain wins. Are the Hillary supporters so stupid to accept another 'Bush' term?