Major Newspapers, |
Wednesday, May 14. 2008Students Fail — and Professor Loses JobTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
reading the original article, I see that this is one more part of the wages of affirmative action.
from the article: A subtext of the discussion is that Norfolk State is a historically black university with a mission that includes educating many students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Sharon R. Hoggard, a spokeswoman for Norfolk State, said "Something is wrong when you cannot impart your knowledge onto students. . . . we take students who are underprepared. . ." According to U.S. Education Department data, only 12 percent of Norfolk State students graduate in four years, and only 30 percent graduate in six years. The problem at Norfolk State, [Aird, the fired professor] said, isn’t his low grades, but the way the university lowers expectations. In a letter he sent to students at the beginning of last January’s semester, he wrote: “You can only develop skills and self-confidence when your professors maintain appropriately rigorous standards in the classroom and insist that you attain appropriate competencies. You cannot genuinely succeed if your professors pander to you. You will simply fail at the next stage in life, where the cost of failure is much greater.”
The standard OUGHT to be to seriously look at any "professor" that awards more than 10% A's and 20% B's. The "all A" approach is the prime reason why those of us in industry totally disregard degrees in anything other than the sciences and engineering D's and F's are common, whilst A's are rare. A 4.0 science student will most probably be good. A 4.0 social science major? Who knows? Many of them cannot even put together a coherent sentence.
I was always a little miffed at grading systems which limit the number of any grade. Just as work should be failed if it does not meet the required standard, other work should be graded according to the quality. A class full of 'A's, while improbable, should be possible, even in a hard marking environment.
"Many of them cannot even put together a coherent sentence," says Mike, in a comment filled with incoherent sentences. Are you one of those who made all those common D's and F's, then? (And no, I don't have a degree in social sciences -- I am a professor in a liberal arts field, though.)
Call me silly, but I don't think one can characterize Mike's message as being "filled with incoherent sentences."
But then again, I'm not a liberal arts professor.
So what happens to Dr. Aird? He is obviously a man of standards and ethics. This is a guy who gave a crap about his students.
Norfolk State fires him but where's he gonna go now. No university/college is going to want him. Can you imagine the replies that he will get when he sends out his resume? "Dr. Aird, I am sorry we can't hire you. Our definition of good professors is based on funding and how many students we can process out of this mill we call academia. We don't think that academics are the real issue here. We have your resume on file and we will contact you later. We wish you much success in your future endeavors."
Most faculty on the hiring committee doesn't care about some political thingy.
That is, when there is no threat to the statis quo. Much screwball hiring decisions are made on 'spur of the moment' and the 'I am a leftist, he is a leftist'. Doesn't matter that he/she is a Stalinist. because, let's face it - all kinds of lefties really like that formulation. They are, of course, 'red daiper babies' (or grand-babies). Which are the 'fuckwits' of western civ. |
SearchSupporterAlamsed reviewed
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> |