Major Newspapers, |
Friday, May 2. 2008Is Obama in Bigger Trouble Than Anyone Thinks?Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Ann knock it off, The truth is with all of this Obama bashing you guys still havent crashed his campaign, on top of it John Mccain still continues to make mistakes like, Shiites, Sunni, and today he said we went to Iraq for the oil. The problem on Hillary's side is that she's a liar and 60% of Americans don't trust her. The problem with people like you are you crave chaos and have no compassion for the Average American who's lives are going to change drastically if either Mccain or Clinton is in the White House. But we don't expect your twisted mine to understand that. Face it, You couldn't take him down. Did you really expect to take a harvard educated mine down with your pea brain.
Probably because I only have a 'pea brain,' I'm having trouble getting my 'mine' around one thing: Who's Ann?
lol
It's that critical thinking the libs are famous for. She saw an Ann Coulter ad on the page and started talking to it.
Linda Obama will not be President might as well start living with it now so when it comes to pass you are already prepared.
I feel sorry for you Linda. You were trying to make a point but you got caught up in the chanch to dis a commenter you appear to loath. Drop the snark, it is unbecoming, and do try again.
Linda wrote: "The problem with people like you are you crave chaos and have no compassion for the Average American who's lives are going to change drastically if either Mccain or Clinton is in the White House."
Linda, Linda, Linda, I thought the Obamessiah was the Change candidate. Now, you're implying that the Change Obamessiah was talking about was the Menopause.
What is a Harvard educated "mine"
This sounds dangerous. Someone call EOD stat!
Voters like Linda can be counted on to follow the fad, listen to the media tell them who to vote for without bothering to learn any details about the candidate or his positions.
There needs to be some limitation on voting maybe a citizenship quiz like the naturalization process.
"The problem with people like you are you crave chaos and have no compassion for the Average American who's lives are going to change drastically if either Mccain or Clinton is in the White House."
And here I was under the impression that Obama was the one calling for "change", and presumably the more drastic the better. Guess my pea brain just isn't able to process your superior intellectual comment.
Whew! The swooners come out fully loaded. Even hint at criticizing messiah and look what it gets you. Only true believers could have more than a pea brain. Linda, clear away some furniture before you look at his picture again. We wouldn't want you to crack open that deep-thinking head of yours!
Maybe he could loan Linda part of his Harvard educated "mine". And I hope the average American knows the difference between who's and whose. Pea brain indeed.
Axey
"...And I hope the average American knows the difference between who's and whose." I wouldn't count on it. Many "average Americans"--even those with education-- don't know the difference between there/their/they're. [Sorry. These sorts of grammar errors are a pet peeve of mine.] But your point that those who claim to be better than others will often demonstrate their ignorance in doing so is well taken. Typos are one thing; ignorance runs deep. And I agree that when McCain wins in November that the lefties will go right off the edge of reason. They've been irrational since Bush was elected in 2000. Obama and Clinton are deeply flawed candidates. When McCain wins, they'll start bursting blood vessels.
I believe the level of angst among Lefties when another conservative takes the presidency is going to be of biblical proportions.
That is, if they believed in the Bible. Perhaps I should say "Q'ranic proportions".
The "swooners," as rrr calls them, members of the "reality-based community" all, will indeed not be dissuaded. They are impermeable to facts or substance. Obama's campaign and appeal were never based on those. But that doesn't matter. The swooners, the enraged sand pounders at Kos and MoveOn and Huffington, etc. will not determine the fall election. Independents and some Dem cohorts will.
Hispanics, already not all that enamored with the Messiah, will likely not be endeared by the good Rev. Wright's antics and Obama's now-obvious association with them. Thinking people in independent land now know Obama lied to them about whatr he knew about the Rev's hate-filled Sundays, and blue collar whites, a significant Dem cohort, will remember the condescension of Bittergate. Let the faithful continue their quixotic crusade.
What gets me is the titanic hypocrisy of obama supporters. If a white guy had attended a church where blacks were even lightly criticized his campaign would be over before it started. Yet any questioning into the Wright issue is categorized as a smear job. How do you people keep up with all your double standards? Write them all down alphabetically? Dewey Decimal? Huge ACLU database?
The only unknown about the demise of the Obama boomlet is when and how Rev. Wright chooses to shut it down. Obama made badly miscalculated when he p****** off Rev. Wright.
A simple fact the Obamatchiks fail to recognize is that their guy has coasted for three months only by virtue of the bizarre Demo nominating process. If Dems ran their nominating system the way the Republicans do or the Electoral College does Clinton would have cinched the nomination in March. Obama -- who has not won a large state primary since February -- would have long ago been shown for the vanity candidate he is.
I actually agree with Linda, but for thoroughly Machiavellian reasons.
We should leave poor Barry alone. We wouldn't want Hillary beating him in the primary. It will interfere with our ability to deliver him a good thrashing in November. So Mr. Obama, please, carry on. I think you are doing a FANTASTIC job. Do you have any more friends you can introduce us to?
Linda: "... people like you ... have no compassion for the Average American who's lives are going to change drastically if either Mccain or Clinton is in the White House."
I thought Obama was the candidate promising 'change'?
What? How can this be? Sen. Obama (D-Hope) dropping in popularity?
Could it be (*gasp!*) that he actually has nothing to offer? Other than hope, of course.
Until recently I regarded Obama as an "empty suit" - good presentation, very light on content.
His gullible followers filled the suit with whatever they wanted. Vague hope n' change platitudes fueled the fervor. Apparently that was the plan. But now people are finding out more about Obama and what actually occupies that suit isn't so attractive.
Arturo wrote: Until recently I regarded Obama as an "empty suit."
Arturo, I used to think the same thing: Obama was the second coming, all right, but the second coming of Jimmy Carter. Now I think he's more like the Manchurian Candidate.
We wouldn't want Hillary beating him in the primary.
Yes, we do. Hillary in the general will energize Republican turnout in a way that Obama won't, and it'll also mean black voters will see Clinton as the one who blocked the first serious Black candidate for President, not McCain.
The Democrats will win the White House in 2008. Doesn't matter if the nominee is Hillary or Obama. Take it to the bank.
Change, Wright, Hope, Rezko, Change, Ayers,Hope, Dinner with his San Fran elite buds........... This rube , Barry Hussein Obama is in WAY over his head. Good thing we have "MAVERICK" John McCain!! The Dem Party is truly becoming the laughing stock of politics
"Hillary in the general will energize Republican turnout in a way that Obama won't, and it'll also mean black voters will see Clinton as the one who blocked the first serious Black candidate for President, not McCain." Very well put. She will take it from him, no doubt.
I fear that Obama will lose all of the remaining primaries.
I remain convinced that the only reason ABC News aired those videos of Rev. Wright is because the person who gave the green light for those videos to air was a Hillary supporter. It would have been much better if Obama clinched the nomination before anyone heard about Rev. Wright. It's fun to see the Dems tear each other apart, but I fear that Hillary will somehow get the nomination. The Blacks, college brats, and limousine libs will all be angry, but I'm afraid that they'll fall into line by November. Obama MUST win NC. We need him as the Dem nominee so that we can make him wish he was never born.
"Obama MUST win NC. We need him as the Dem nominee so that we can make him wish he was never born. " Nope, it's gotta be Hillary! She has 60% negatives around the whole country. McCain can beat her handily. Meanwhile, Operation Chaos continues...
I've never voted for a Republican in my life and I've been voting since Nixon/McGovern but I will not vote for Obama. He is a brilliant orator but beyond that, Mr. Obama has nothing to offer. Is it too much to ask that a candidate who's entire platform rests on themes such as "post racial" and "post partisan" offer some evidence of his abilities to either bridge the race gap or reach across party lines to solve problems? If Obama is the candidate, Democrats will have again pulled defeat from the jaws of victory. Someone needs to tell Obama that "hope" is not a strategy.
|
SearchSupporterAlmased reviewed
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> |