Major Newspapers, |
Friday, August 31. 2007Hypocrisy and Double Standards for Creepy BehaviorTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
From the Statesman, 2/19/1998:
"A misdemeanor charge against Ben Sargent, the Austin American-Statesman's editorial cartoonist, was reduced to indecent exposure Wednesday. Sargent was arrested Jan. 20 on a charge of public lewdness at Pleasureland, an adult book and video store at 613 W. 29th St. The charge was reduced because public lewdness requires two participants, which was not the case in Sargent's arrest, Travis County Attorney Ken Oden said." Apparently the Pleasureland employee who called the cops after warning B.S. to stop "pleasuring himself" didn't count as a second person. No hypocrisy that I can see, 'cause the Statesman doesn't support traditional family values... too passe.
The cartoonist's past has nothing to do with hypocrisy or double standards. There may be something to discuss there, but it's so far removed from the issue of Senator Craig that it doesn't deserve mentioning.
Applying the standard you are suggesting exists would remove most of us from commenting on almost everything. Sorry - Craig has brought this on himself. I do not care about his orientation - I care about the fact that for almost 30 years he chose very publicly not to accept that others share his same desires.
I think this has everything to do with double standards and hypocrisy.
Creepy behavior is creepy behavior, regardless of one's stance on any issue. Applying the standard of full disclosure would not "remove most of us from commenting on everything," as you argue. That said, Craig deserves what he gets; I'm just as sick of the sanctimony of 'progressives' like Sargent as I am of people like Craig.
Do a search on Mr. Sargent. Nothing comes up relating to these accusations. Maybe the interweb isn't the font of knowledge some think it is.
Maybe the folks who control the popular search engines have more in common with Mr. Sargent than they do with critics of Mr. Sargent.
"the folks who control the popular search engines"? Don't tell me you're going all 'Conservapedia' on us...
Isn't it far more likely that the folks on the internet just aren't that interested in a cartoonist's sex life?
It seems pretty certain that the stories were scrubbed by someone...
This is one of those cases that could use a hypocrisy referee; the cartoon is based on the idea of family values republicans and a "do as I say, not as I do" mentality... Since Mr. Sargent has probably never condemned someone for their perversions before engaging in his own he wasn't a hypocrite... Except for that time he drew a cartoon criticizing someone for the same type of perversions he engaged in...
What's really sad to me though is that I think the cartoon would be twice as funny if the cartoonist had added one line "note: this cartoon drawn by a pervert" down at the bottom.
Of course Sargent is a hypocrite: Creepy behavior is creepy behavior is creepy behavior.
Adding the tagline that you suggest would assume that the Statesman and Sargent had some guts regarding this matter. It seems they don't.
You know, I remember a case of a famous (sort of) person being caught naked and masturbating in a porn store but there is nothing online that I can find, even omitting Sargent's name, that I can find about any similar case of lewd conduct in a porn store. Doesn't someone keep lists of this kind of thing? Where is the famous perverts list?
|
SearchSupporterAlamsed reviewed
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> |