Andrew Sullivan no longer trusts the judgment of Iraq Commander General David Petraeus because he has appeared as a guest on Hugh Hewitt's radio show. (More from Sullivan here.)

Sullivan disagrees strongly with Hewitt's politics, considering him a 'Republican propagandist,' writing:

I think such a decision to cater to one party's propaganda outlet renders Petraeus' military independence moot. I'll wait for the transcript. But Petraeus is either willing to be used by the Republican propaganda machine or he is part of the Republican propaganda machine. I'm beginning to suspect the latter. The only thing worse than a deeply politicized and partisan war is a deeply politicized and partisan commander. But we now know whose side Petraeus seems to be on: Cheney's. Expect spin, not truth, in September.

However, Sullivan supports some of the ideas of Ron Paul, who has appeared numerous times on the radio show of conspiracy theorist extraordinaire Alex Jones.

Hewitt, a man who clearly supports Republicans, is apparently more unpalatable to Sullivan than Jones, a 9/11 conspiracy theorist who also thinks that the federal government is spreading a cancer virus in order to kill Americans, and who advocated the theory that 'black helicopters' in Louisiana were proof that President Bill Clinton was going to declare martial* law in the US using Chinese and Russian troops to pacify US citizens.

Yes, it's that time again:

Which Description Best Fits Andrew Sullivan?
	A tedious bore
	A fraud
	A tiresome scold
	A beacon of light in a terrible and dreary world
	The next quarterback of the Chicago Bears
	None of the above
Free polls from Pollhost.com

* Corrected for typo.