The deadly siren of sloppy "good intentions"

The crushing stupidity of leftist liberals originates from the seduction of "good intentions". "No matter how sloppy or foolish I am in my actions, I at least mean well--therefore I am a force for good". This is the lure: The most stupid, sloppy, lazy among us can all claim to be a force for good--as long as they mean well. What a horrible mistake in thinking this is!

What is worse than bad intentions? Good intentions sloppily carried out.

I will prove it to you this way: Consider a homeless person on the street living under a box. The well-intentioned (but sloppy) liberal decides to build for the person a house. Because he is so wrapped up in self-glorification that he must be a force for good because he means well, that (s)he gives workmanship short shrift and ends up building death-trap. The poor homeless person gleefully moves out of his cardboard box, moves into the death-trap and is promptly killed. The liberal has already moved on to the next ostensible "good deed" and is so busy basking in the self-gratification of polishing his halo and showing it off to friends that(s)he doesn't even realise he effectively just killed the guy. He is indeed worse off than if he had been left alone in the cardboard box where he was at least alive. He would have done the guy more good if he had been so "greedy and evil" as to buy himself a Ferrari or something with the money.

The desire for a quick hit of "feel good" the same way you used to get a quick bong hit or toke on a doobie back in college leads the typical liberal to overlook the sloppiness in careful thinking as well as execution --on the grounds that "yeah but intentions are good, (so it will come out good.)" No so: In the political sphere, when an blatanly bad man blatantly does evil, at least, because it is so blatant, good men will step forward to oppose him and mitigate the evil. But when foolish and sloppy people who are deemed to be acting out of good intentions do something which (due to sloppiness) is easily exploited by evil people shewdly looking for such "useful idiots" to cause harm, such idioits easily become trojan horses to explode behind the lines of the forces of good. They are unopposed and able to go where they do much more harm than those who are blatantly evil--due to the "sheep's clothing" of their "good intentions".
Thus the well-intentioned sloppy people end up doing the worst harm of all. And why are the liberal well-intentioned so typically sloppy in execution? Because the salve of "good intentions" dulls the need for rigor. After all, it is more democratic to let stupid, lazy and sloppy al participate in good deeds than limiting good deeds to the rigorous, intelligent, well-educated, competent and scrupulously exacting in workmanship. As you can now see, rigorous thinking, and workmanship are more important than good intentions by far, and without those things, good intentions do more harm than good.