Major Newspapers, |
Monday, June 4. 2007Obama Knows his Way Around a BallotTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Usually I'm behind you with the Chicago stuff, but this reads like it was written for people who don't know just how many fake signatures there are on your average Chicago petition. It's unusual, but not unbelievable, that the 4 other guys deserved to be thrown off the ballot.
Then you follow up with the quote that makes it sound as if he's bragging about winning, when really, because he lost that race, the "good state senator" is a polite reference to the guy Obama lost to. You also leave out the part of the Trib article where poor little down-trodden Askia admits the precinct workers most likely did forge the signatures. If you keep this up, I'm not going to take you seriously the next time you write an article about biased reporting.
I couldn't disagree more!
Included among the four candidates thrown off the ballot in 1996 was the incumbent at the time, whose time in office clearly indicated that she had political support. And the quote I included cannot be in any way a reference to the former state senator -- whom Obama had thrown off the ballot -- Obama did not lose to her. The only race Obama lost was to Bobby Rush in 2000, for the US House. And the article is pertinent precisely because Sen. Obama is being sold as a new kind of candidate.
Yeesh that's embarrassing.
I think I'm going to go ahead and self-ban myself from commenting on any other Obama topics. I've obviously had too much of the Kool Aid. The only thing I can say in my defense is that I've seen incumbents fake their signatures, but that's an unfair accusation for me to make when I obviously don't know the district very well. Only thing I can say in Sen. Obama's defense is that you don't walk through a swamp without getting muddy.
Look, Chicago politics is as hard-nosed a brand as is practiced anywhere, and Obama played it tough back in 1996. Nothing wrong with that.
But he can't have it both ways by then claiming that he wants to be considered a new brand of pol. Which is obviously a big part of his current strategy....
I suppose so. But considering the story about JFK and the two Josephs that went up just a few days ago, there's nothing to say that Obama can't move on and live up to his own words.
Most politicians shed their skin at one point or another. Especially in American politics, where voters are short on memory and long on forgiveness.
I certainly wouldn't want to root against him -- if he is able to live up to his aspirations.
But I'm from Chicago... |
SearchSupporterAlamsed reviewed
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> |