Major Newspapers, |
Wednesday, May 16. 2007Ron Paul Panders to 9/11 Conspiracy NutsTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Just so you know, most of the victim's family members still have alot of questions that weren't addressed in the Commission Report. Is it "nutty" Americans to want answers?
Plus, what is RP supposed to do? He gets bombarded by a kid. Good Lord, man. You're really reaching now.
I don't think it's a reach at all for a presidential candidate to say, "I respectfully disagree with your supposition that 9/11 was an inside job."
Pretty simple.
Not everyone believes it was an "inside job". Alot of people just want answers. Is there something wrong with that? Is it un-American to ask questions? If this is a free country like we're told it is and "we the people" pay the salaries of our representatives then the people have a right to know why their father, mother, or child was killed. There is nothing wrong with that and there's no reason to be ashamed of wanting to know what happened. You, and so many others, should be helping to get the answers to the most historic event since Pearl Harbor instead of rediculing your own brothers and sisters in this country.
We're borrowing hundreds of billions of dollars from the communist Chinese to fight possibly 3 wars and so far we've lost 3,500 brave American soldiers as a result of 9/11. I think the families' questions are more than warranted.
What answers are you seeking on behalf of "we the people"?
I think we know why the people in New York and Washington, DC, were killed. Do you have information to change that viewpoint?
Is it "un-American" to question the holes in the official conspiracy theory which has been fed to us from Day One? With so little to back it up?
The most heinous criminal attack on US soil never received a criminal investigation. Ever. And it amazes me that the vast majority of Americans are not apalled by that fact.
Please explain the 'holes,' as you see them, in the official explanation of 9/11.
Well, here's one example from the Washington Post.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101300.html
The link doesn't work.
Summarize it if you have time, or send the complete url.
I got the link to work -- I goofed previously....
This is an old article that discusses a bureacracy covering its ass and has nothing to do with who was responsible for the attacks. This is your evidence of 'holes' in the government's findings about the attacks?
"This is an old article that discusses a bureacracy covering its ass and has nothing to do with who was responsible for the attacks."
That's beside the point. The point is that we don't have the truth and/or the whole truth. So, of course that is considered a hole. Alot of people lied. Bush refused to testify under oath. And on and on. Yes, it's a BIG hole when the Commission knows of so much lying that they consider consulting the Justice Department for a criminal investigation. It's about the truth. Whatever it is, people deserve the whole truth. I mean, when the Commission ITSELF knows their story is a lie why the hell is everyone to believe it? That's not logical.
It's not beside the point -- they lied about the length of time it took them to respond!
This proves that there is a 'hole' in the story? What utter nonsense!
Tommy boy,
Here's one hole for you to fill (keep your finger in it or the dike might burst). Of course, if you find that the commission resolved this issue, please provide the proof of that. If not, well, please don't become a conspiracy nut just because there might be a conspiracy. http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO408B.html Altitude and Cellphone Transmission =================================== According to industry experts, the crucial link in wireless cell phone transmission from an aircraft is altitude. Beyond a certain altitude which is usually reached within a few minutes after takeoff, cell phone calls are no longer possible. In other words, given the wireless technology available on September 11 2001, these cell calls could not have been placed from high altitude.
What nonsense!
Technology available in 2001 allowed cell phones to work at the atltitudes those planes were flying (up to 35,000 feet, if sporadically).
One more link - Wikipedia 911 entry.
=================================== Get your full summary of 911 and potential conspiracies here (a good objective place to start if you have no set opinion and are open-minded): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories The truth will set you free.
Did you see who they caught in the Dix terror attempt? Albanians.
When Clinton was bombing the Serbs, Giuliani corralled a bunch of Albanians to protest at midnight resurrection services outside of the Manhattan Serb Cathedral. TO their credit, even the Albanians were reluctant. What you get is the politicians who won't tow the Vatican line on one issue have to toe it even more on other issues to make up for it. Giuliani was tied into the muslims because Saladjic lived near Molinari. But McCain had the soldiers write "Happy Easter" on the bombs. THe Catholics love the muslims, because they vote like them and hate democracy, commerce and Jews. This is why 9/11 was definitely Rudy's Yugo Blow Back.
Here is the answer, and I hope this settles it. Sometimes bad things happen. A group of people that share with another group of people a deep hatred for the US had the guts and twisted minds and leadership and money necessary to carry out a plan against my country. As an American, I hate what they did, but they did it. OK, there we have the answer. I offer my sincere condolences to the families and friends of the victims of the hundreds of thousands of innocents that died as a result of this plan. Yes the government lies about most stuff, but this is not a big conspiracy & Ron Paul obviously knows it.
|
SearchSupporterAlamsed reviewed
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> |