Major Newspapers, |
Sunday, April 2. 2006What is it About Academia?Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Not so much depressed as moonbatworthy out of touch. As a former grad student I can tell you that grad serfs do get rather depressed (especially as their bills mount) but you do have to be almost morally myopically focused to get a doctorate, especially in a field when you are likely to end up teaching and doing research. To your Texan zoologist most of the human species are not 'real,' in any sense. The ideas in his mind are real, living, breathing organic human beings are an illusion and encumberance. Not out of the ordinary, alas.
TO: Tom Elia
RE: I Think.... ...these people have been reading entirely TOO MUCH Tom Clancy; e.g., Rainbow Six. It's interesting to see that so many other people feel the same way as this fellow does. Don't they realize they'll be a good part of the 90% dead? Or are they hoping to get vaccine-B? And living in the estates that everyone else leaves behind? Without electricity or water or plumbing. Not to forget good food. We're talking about real acadamian nuts here. Regards, Chuck(le)
The article didn't indicate whether Pianka was volunteering to be first in line. Certainly someone with such principles would want to volunteer to do his part if he's really that worried. I mean he couldn't just say something like this to draw attention to himself now, could he?
TO: Barry Dauphin
RE: Actually.... "Certainly someone with such principles would want to volunteer to do his part if he's really that worried. I mean he couldn't just say something like this to draw attention to himself now, could he?" -- Barry Dauphin I would expect the 'good doctor'—who operates a DNA lab-is thinking along the lines of doing HIS part in a more 'constructive' manner. Regards, Chuck(le)
According to Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi you are happy when you do meaningful work, and depressed when you do not.
So yeah, I'd say most academics are depressed.
Zoologists study animals, and some zoologists value animals more than people. So it's not surprising some zoologists would want fewer people. Disgusting, yes.
A greater percentage of us are living, and living longer. That proves we're failing?
Most of that population increase is nonwhite. Does this guy think the wrong people are living? Why isn't anyone calling this guy a racist?
Is he also offering to kill his own offspring? Nephews and nieces?
I suggest he get a little taste of his 'future' by cutting his consumption of 'stuff' that would be made or transported or cared for by that 90% that would go away. That should keep him pretty busy, I'd think.
I took Eric Pianka's environmental ecology class 15 years ago at UT. He was old and crazy back then. I see he's older and crazier now. A poster boy for why tenure can be a bad, bad thing.
Pianka's website contains his hagiographic auto-obituary.
Curiously, it does not mention that he dies an excruciating, lingering death from ebola.
Hmmm...
I'm beginning to think we need security clearances for anyone with access to molecular biology technology. Clearly this guy should get nowhere near. If you read down in that article, he advocates "good terrorism" of this sort. Maybe not today, but real soon now, it will be possible to design pathogens in the lab. It's probably the most likely doomsday scenario, given that a few people can actually keep a secret until it's too late. Airborne prions, anyone?
Just another neo-Mathusian who never read Julian Simon. Everyone else has figured out by now that the reason humanity keeps getting more prosperous, instead of less, as the Malthusians keep predicting, is that the average human contributes more to the technological advance that makes resourse use more efficient than he uses up resourses, leading to a net increase in resources. There is no war between humanity and the planet, but the eco-freaks still want to kill off humanity.
He must have never read "Nature's End" by Streiber & Kunetka. Although it's fiction, it does raise the question:
What would be the ultimate ecological result of 5 or 6 billion (almost simultaneous) corpses? You should be careful what you wish for, because sometimes wishes come true.
I took his class about 10 years ago. Crazy misanthrope then, and as darkuspawnus says, crazier now.
His own kids? I'm pretty sure he hasn't got any to have killed by Ebola. I'm also pretty sure he doesn't have a DNA lab, folks. His research generally involved living like a hermit in Austrailia for 6 months at a time, catching a few hundred lizards and sticking thermometers up their privates.
Academe is dominanted by nihilist--such as the environmentalists, whose mission statement since the first Earth Day is summarized by this prof's remarks.
Where have ya'll been for the past 40 years?
I wouldn't be surprised if they were depressed: this is a group of people who, despite their brains, never made it out of school. The sense of guilt and wasted potential must be crushing.
|
SearchSupporterAlamsed reviewed
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> |