Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), waxing eloquent on the Senate floor about opponents of ObamaCare:

"Why all this discord and discourtesy, all this unprecedented destructive action? All to break the momentum of our new young president.

"They are desperate to break this president. They have ardent supporters who are nearly hysterical at the very election of President Barack Obama. The birthers, the fanatics, the people running around in right-wing militia and Aryan support groups, it is unbearable to them that President Barack Obama should exist. That is one powerful reason. It is not the only one."

Okay, if it's all right for a US Senator to engage in such over-the-top and predictable lefty hyperbole, perhaps it's okay for a short, fat, bald man with a big nose like me to engage in a form of it too.

To wit, are all supporters of ObamaCare like Sen. Whitehouse? You know, clueless rich kids born in Manhattan who have manly lisps and went to prep schools and then Ivy-League colleges? (I'll leave the Sheldon jokes to Billy Crystal: but do you think this Sheldon wears silk u-trou and gets $150 haircuts?)

Do they emphasize his family lineage on Wikipedia, like Whitehouse does? More importantly, are they bereft of any private-sector experience, as Sen. Whitehouse apparently is? When one of their fingers is pricked, do they bleed vinegar and water?

So, whose over-the-top hyperbole is better? Mine, or Sen. Whitehouse's?

Whose rhetorical hyperbole do you prefer?
	The Ivy League Douchebag's? (Whitehouse)
	The short, fat, bald peasant's? (Elia)
Free polls from Pollhost.com