" ... straight outta the Lone Star moonbat asylum of Austin, comes this erudite conservative group blog. Think Powerline with a little Tex-Mex flava."
- Iowahawk
"You're a bunch of right-wing whack jobs."
- a reader
" ... an excellent and aptly-named Austin, TX-based blog ... You must check it out."
- Rosenblog
"You are the new media? Go to hell..."
- a reader
E-mail
tpelia@yahoo.com
paulsgeary@gmail.com
Economics, Science, & Technology Related Blogs and Web Sites
More proof that the Chicago Democrats in the White House think you're an economic illiterate, from Live Science.com (via Yahoo): (emphasis added)
More than 50 percent of Americans believe a public insurance option will increase health care costs, according to a new survey on assertions the White House has called myths.
...
"It's perhaps not surprising that more Republicans believe these things than Democrats," said study scientist Dr. Aaron Carroll, director of Indiana University's Center for Health Policy and Professionalism Research. "What is surprising is just how many Republicans - and Independents - believe them. If the White House hopes to convince the majority of Americans that they are misinformed about health care reform, there is much work to be done."
Among the results on items the White House considers myths:
67 percent of respondents believe that wait times for health care services, such as surgery, will increase (91 percent of Republicans, 37 percent of Democrats, 72 percent of Independents).
About five out of 10 believe the federal government will become directly involved in making personal health care decisions (80 percent of Republicans, 25 percent of Democrats, 56 percent of Independents).
...
54 percent believe the public option will increase premiums for Americans with private health insurance (78 percent of Republicans, 28 percent of Democrats, 58 percent of Independents).
Five out of 10 think cuts will be made to Medicare in order to cover more Americans (66 percent of Republicans, 37 percent of Democrats, 44 percent of Independents).
Another spokesman for the 'other Chicago School of Economics' explains his theory: